"R. Joseph Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> If you can tell us a little more about the context and sense in which you
> are seeking file type information, we may be able to help you find the
> distinctions appropriate to that context.

First... point taken about the bit-anding.  But as you said. (and I'm
paraphrasing here) "Any self respecting programmer needs to know about
that...." but `self respecting programmer' is several jumps up from my
level..

This is going to sound pretty lame but I've actually lost sight of
why I wanted to know file type.  It has come up a few times in
various scripts ... I wanted a function that just spits out the info
like Unix(gnu) `stat' does.  First line of unix `stat' output tells the
type.  Its more acuratte than -f -d tests.  Or even better, something
that behaves like unix `file' command.

And as far as environment goes, I'm always working on a linux or
openbsd platform... occassionally solaris (x86).  I use the term
`working' loosely here since my efforts are really little more than a
retiree's tinkering.


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to