Ville Jungman wrote: > to hear everybody saying that this is a great thing! But maybe someone > agrees with me. What did You think first time You heard about objects, perl > or something else, what __________?
The first ime I heard about "Object Oriented Programming", it sounded like a silly-ass buzzword. The first time I looked at an example of OO, I thought, "What a great idea. Have your programming constructs look like objects in the real world!" > At first glance they might not feel very > temptating but feelings might change after using them? Hmmm, can you explain just how this construct would reduce gratuitous techiness and lend to natural communication of intent? Joseph [snip Most of us keep archives, and can consult them for the full text of past posts.] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
