Wiggins d Anconia wrote: > > please let's do a split(/\s/, "Perl Programmer"). > > > > this return one array with two scalar: > > Perl > > Programmer > > > > that's why > > > > Back to semantics, define "Programmer". Your definition of programmer, > if it requires any knowledge of UML, is so strict that it will not work > in 99% of circles where the term is thrown around *today*. Admittedly I > have very little knowledge of UML, but my employer seems very happy with > my abilities as a "programmer", and from what little I have seen and > read around the subject UML is a colossal waste of time on any "real" > programming project. > > http://danconia.org >
UML? Isn't that the stuff the once-long-ago-knew-how-to-code professional sycophants use to make pretty pictures for execs, so that the execs can go to bed in the warm contented illusion that they actually understand something about the systems they are paying for? Joseph > > Boycott the Sugar Bowl! You couldn't pay me to watch that game. Okay. So what is it about the Sugar Bowl? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
