On Jan 13, 2004, at 10:33 AM, Rob Dixon wrote: [..]
Like I said, read what others have to say and adopt your own policy, but be consistent.
Rob
My only complaint is that the consistency position should be consistent within the context - either in an archeological sense - namely that if one finds code written from the same period it should all have a similar consistency - or in a totally contextual sense - namely that a given perl module that one cuts that has a clear and compelling argument within itself for adhering to the given rule set and/or exception to the rule set...
The important point is that one should cut the code with the open dread that one will be the person who will have to come back and refactor the code - so leave one's self bread crumb trails about why one did which - it will help....
ciao drieux
---
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
