I think it's easy to ignore a question that I'm not interested in, and I don't mind a wide variety of topics. However, a message that doesn't relate to Perl at all should at least have "OT" in the subject, especially for the sake of those who are offended by such things.
At 06:17 PM 2/2/04 -0000, Rob Dixon wrote: >Michael Johnson wrote: >> >> Just a very broad open question on anyone using this set up for their >> enterprise system. I am looking into setting something like this. I have >> seen much of the research so I am interesting in opinions and experience for >> the responses. >> >> Any and all thoughts are welcome. > >Hmm. perl.beginners has a lot of non-beginner questions, which is fine. >But Isn't this a little /too/ OT? On the othe hand, this group works so well >that it's hard to consider how to split it: I think we get most of >perl.beginners.cgi traffic already. > >I wonder what others think? > >Rob > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ><http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response> > > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
