--- James Edward Gray II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It makes perfect sense, yes, but I'm still missing
> one piece of
> information, the broken code you would like fixed.
> As I said in my
> last message, "...just post that nested foreach and
> let us help you fix
> it."
My mistake, I thought I had pasted into my message.
Here it is:
===============================
#for loops that will loop through @list and
@primelist, getting the
#modulus of @primelist. I anticipate that this will
isolate prime
#numbers.
for ($i = 0; $i <= $input; $i++)
{
for ($j = 0; $j <= $input; $j++)
{
if ($primelist[$i] % $list[$j])
{
unshift(@newPrimeList, $primelist[$i]);
print "I just added $primelist[$i] to
newPrimeList.\n";
}
}
}
print "this is primelist: @primelist\n";
print "this is newPrimeList: @newPrimeList\n";
================================
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
