Smoot Carl-Mitchell wrote:

On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:50:54 -0500
"JupiterHost.Net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


So flock(FH, LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB) then?


Yes.



So:
my $rc = flock(FH, LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB);

if($rc == 0) { warn "rats! Exclusive lock not granted, oh well..."; } if(!defined $rc) { die "Could not get lock no how mr flock guy!"; }

or

if(!$rc) { $! =~ m/No Lock/ ? warn "not exclusive but locked - $!" :
die "no lock - $!"; }


If $rc is zero, you likely did not get the lock. You might have a zero
return code with a parameter error, in which case $! is set to a
different message.

Here is a little script I used to test all this.  I ran the script and
backgrounded it on my Linux box.  I then ran a second copy to see what
the return code and $! are when the lock is grabbed by the first
process.

#!/usr/bin/perl -w

use strict; use Fcntl ':flock';
open(ZZZ, ">zzz");
my $ret = flock(ZZZ, LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB);
print "$ret $!\n";
sleep 60;




Thanks for the info BTW I really appreciate it! :)


No problem.


Excellent I'll give that go and experiment away, thanks a bunch for the great idea!


HAGO

Lee.M - JupiterHost.Net



-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>




Reply via email to