----- Original Message -----
From: Christian Stalp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 12:18 pm
Subject: Re: cannot call a process via telnet
>
> > It appears from the docs that the C<cmd> method can take a
> timeout as
> > well. I suspect adding the '&' will cause problems because the
> shell> will return control to Net::Telnet and there will be no way to
> > communicate with the process. Note that when you switch to include
> > other arguments with C<cmd> it appears you need to pass the
> command with
> > the 'String' key.
>
> Sure but this doesn't make any change if I call the cmd with a
> prepared
> string or a directly into the brackets. I was at this point a few
> hours
> before. Calling a process with the cmd- method. Then I found the
> print -
> method in the docs. But both have the same problem: sending a
> command over
> the telnet without waiting for the answer. And I don't want to
> change the
> timeout because the script has more functions than to wait for
> another
> process exit. The docs doesn't give any solution how to make this!
>
> Its no problem to call a process manualy over the telnet with a
> '&' at least
> our servers!
Gruss,
Perhaps what you are looking for is net-rexec ??
>
> Gruss Christian
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
