On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 09:38 +0100, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: > Casey West wrote: > > And I should point out that I agree. However, that doesn't excuse bad > > behavior in response. Furthermore, I expect more from a responder > > than a questioner. > > Okay, I've made up my mind. I don't have the required patience with the > lazy dogs, so I don't fit here. Of course, you can always follow Jenda's > advice and ignore them. And I will. I'll ignore this list from now on. > > Good luck! And beware of offending the flashes.
Have you stopped to consider that the reaction you have to your posting style being questioned is the same reaction some people have to your posts? If you're willing to abandon the list over someone questioning your style, how many people have also been willing to abandon it when they're slammed for violating some unknown etiquette? The intent here wasn't to attach you personally; it was to say that perhaps there's a better way to do things. (Does that sound familiar?) If you do leave, your knowledge will be sorely missed. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
