On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Peter Rabbitson wrote:

> Anyway my 2c - I myself use the [$elided] archives quite a bit, which 
> does not prevent me from owning hard prints of the Cookbook, the 
> Pocket Ref and recently Object Oriented Perl. It however prevents from 
> owning 2 pcs of each of those not-so-slim books so I could equally 
> easy refer to this or that at work and at home.

More to the point, it prevents you purchasing copies of the CD Bookshelf 
series from O'Reilly that the site you mention has posted copies of. 
Carrying around all these books might be a pain, but carrying around 
your own, legal, copy of the CD would be fine. 

I believe that Manning has also provided _Object-Oriented Perl_ in an 
electronic form that has been pirated on sites like this, but I haven't 
seen that one. 

So... your point doesn't really stand up to scrutiny. It *IS* a form of 
theft, no matter how much you would prefer to whitewash that fact. If 
the site were legit, it wouldn't need to hide on a Ukranian server.

> Michael made a solid point - he found it via google.

And I can't & won't stop Google from finding & indexing sites of varying 
levels of legality & ethical acceptability. On the other hand, if a site 
is ethically questionable -- as these sites clearly are -- then at a 
minimum it would be wise to at least not give them any publicity, and by 
so doing encourage other people to also pirate these books. 

These sites have come up before on this list and other ones, and pretty 
much every time they do, at least one noted Perl author speaks up saying 
that these sites are effectively stealing from him, that he does not 
condone this, and that he's personally offended that people are passing 
this stuff around. I sympathize with that. It takes a lot of care and 
effort to write a technical book, and even then the authors don't really 
earn a whole lot for their efforts. To repay that effort by encouraging 
piracy is, in a very real sense, a way of saying "please stop publishing 
these books, we're not interested in buying them anyway."

Please step back from this whole "information wants to be free" nonsense 
and think about the consequences of what you're advocating. 



That said, if anyone else wants to discuss this, it should probably be 
done off list. I'm not trying to encourage a flame war here; I'm trying 
to discourage advocacy of something that should have no place here.

 

-- 
Chris Devers

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>


Reply via email to