[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I whole heartedly agree! > > top post rules!
well, it certainly doesn't require the poster to spend much thought on his post. Hit reply, press some keys, done. Readability be damned, and who cares about bandwidth and storage anymore? Probably "Ryan Frantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [note how I can't tell who wrote what?] > Sure, don't top-post. But then who's gonna bother to scroll > to the end of the email as the thread gets longer? Many You don't have to. Intelligent posters quote what they need, editing out the superfluous stuff. Note how the comments go close to the quoted material? > users don't even realize that there is a reply in > bottom-posted emails. "Look, that idiot send me a quote-only mail again". Yeah, right. > Bottom-posting ignores the natural > behavior of most users. And they'd probably still pee in the corners if they hadn't been housebroken by their parents ;-) > As an added note, just get over it. It's nothing to sweat. Actually, in my book it's a show of rudeness. By top posting you clearly place your own comfort over that of your readers. Cheers, Thomas -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
