Todd W wrote:
"Mathew Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<snip>
The most popular web browser found in cell phones is made by openwave.
Personally, I consider the openwave browser the "standard" (If a phone
dosen't have an openwave browser, it is not worth supporting). They have
an extensive developer resource found at http://developer.openwave.com/.
They have free SDKs (if you choose to use them... remember, these are
plain ol' web apps), and free simulators (very, very useful).
<snip>
Todd W.
This kind of thinking is why there are so many problems rendering pages in
non-IE browsers on the desktop.
Mathew
Wrong. This kind of thinking is why rendering pages in non-IE browsers on
the desktop works.
On the desktop, if you program your web app to support the specs it will
work in any browser supports the spec. If you program the app to use IE only
features it will not work in any other browser.
In the phone, if you program your web app to support the specs it work in
any browser that supports the spec. If you program the app to use [vendor]
only features it will not work in any other browser.
Todd W.
And yet, it isn't worth supporting any other browser than openwave? By
your own statement, if an app is written properly it will be supported
by any browser. If instead, you only write for openwave, you are, in
effect, writing for a phone-based IE.
Mathew
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
