On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Dr.Ruud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: snip > > Is there a reason I am missing to use [[:blank:]] over [ \t]? > > The [:blank:] matches (at least) 18 codepoints. unicount.pl: > http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2007/02/msg121080.html > > I prefer some of the named ones, like [:blank:] and [:punct:] and > [:xdigit:]. snip
Ah-ha, perlre is wrong then. It claims that space is 'A GNU extension equivalent to [ \t] , "all horizontal whitespace"', but that must only be true under the bytes pragma. It's perlbug time. -- Chas. Owens wonkden.net The most important skill a programmer can have is the ability to read. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://learn.perl.org/
