Didn't modify some hard coded number correctly in previous patch. Now fix them. This could pass the corresponding regressions in piglit test.
Signed-off-by: Zhigang Gong <[email protected]> --- backend/src/backend/gen_insn_selection.cpp | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/backend/src/backend/gen_insn_selection.cpp b/backend/src/backend/gen_insn_selection.cpp index d0e3d0b..961f3af 100644 --- a/backend/src/backend/gen_insn_selection.cpp +++ b/backend/src/backend/gen_insn_selection.cpp @@ -1259,7 +1259,7 @@ namespace gbe } void Selection::Opaque::I64SATADD(Reg dst, Reg src0, Reg src1, GenRegister tmp[5]) { - SelectionInstruction *insn = this->appendInsn(SEL_OP_I64SATADD, 7, 2); + SelectionInstruction *insn = this->appendInsn(SEL_OP_I64SATADD, 6, 2); insn->dst(0) = dst; insn->src(0) = src0; insn->src(1) = src1; @@ -1302,12 +1302,12 @@ namespace gbe insn->dst(i + 1) = tmp[i]; } - void Selection::Opaque::I64_MUL_HI(Reg dst, Reg src0, Reg src1, GenRegister tmp[10]) { - SelectionInstruction *insn = this->appendInsn(SEL_OP_I64_MUL_HI, 11, 2); + void Selection::Opaque::I64_MUL_HI(Reg dst, Reg src0, Reg src1, GenRegister tmp[9]) { + SelectionInstruction *insn = this->appendInsn(SEL_OP_I64_MUL_HI, 10, 2); insn->dst(0) = dst; insn->src(0) = src0; insn->src(1) = src1; - for(int i = 0; i < 10; i ++) + for(int i = 0; i < 9; i ++) insn->dst(i + 1) = tmp[i]; } -- 1.8.3.2 _______________________________________________ Beignet mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet
