On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 08:03:10AM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 01:13:18AM +0000, Luo, Xionghu wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> > According to the opencl-1.2 spec in page 165, the option 
> > CL_KERNEL_GLOBAL_WORK_SIZE for clGetKernelWorkGroupInfo should call built 
> > in kernel or custom device.
> > 
> > "This provides a mechanism for the
> > application to query the maximum global
> > size that can be used to execute a kernel
> > (i.e. global_work_size argument to
> > clEnqueueNDRangeKernel) on a custom
> > device given by device or a built-in kernel
> > on an OpenCL device given by device.
> > If device is not a custom device or kernel
> > is not a built-in kernel,
> > clGetKernelArgInfo returns the error
> > CL_INVALID_VALUE."
> > 
> > And this case called dummy kernel instead of built in kernel, so the return 
> > value is not as expected, my patch could call built in kernel to test the 
> > correct return value of option CL_KERNEL_GLOBAL_WORK_SIZE.
> > 
> 
> I'm still confused by this patch, because the CL_KERNEL_GLOBAL_WORK_SIZE enum
> value does not appear anywhere in this patch or in the file being patched.
Hi Tom,

Please check the following code in the get-kernel-work-group-info.c:

  const cl_kernel_work_group_info* kernel_work_group_infos =
    PIGLIT_CL_ENUM_ARRAY(cl_kernel_work_group_info);

And the cl_kernel_work_group_info is defined as below in piglit-util-cl-enum.c 
as below:

  PIGLIT_CL_DEFINE_ENUM_2(cl_kernel_work_group_info, 3, 5, 6) = {
      CL_KERNEL_WORK_GROUP_SIZE,
      CL_KERNEL_COMPILE_WORK_GROUP_SIZE,
      CL_KERNEL_LOCAL_MEM_SIZE,
  #ifdef CL_VERSION_1_1
      CL_KERNEL_PREFERRED_WORK_GROUP_SIZE_MULTIPLE,
      CL_KERNEL_PRIVATE_MEM_SIZE, // 5
  #endif //CL_VERSION_1_1
  #ifdef CL_VERSION_1_2
      CL_KERNEL_GLOBAL_WORK_SIZE,
  #endif //CL_VERSION_1_2
  };
  PIGLIT_CL_DEFINE_ENUM_PTR_2(cl_kernel_work_group_info);

You can see the CL_KERNEL_GLOBAL_WORK_SIZE is the last element of that array 
when
CL_VERSION_1_2 is defined.


Thanks,
Zhigang Gong.

> 
> -Tom
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Luo Xionghu
> > Best Regards
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tom Stellard [mailto:[email protected]] 
> > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 10:14 PM
> > To: Luo, Xionghu
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] fix CL_KERNEL_GLOBAL_WORK_SIZE bug.
> > 
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 06:05:12AM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> > > From: Luo <[email protected]>
> > > 
> > > the option  CL_KERNEL_GLOBAL_WORK_SIZE for clGetKernelWorkGroupInfo 
> > > should call built in kernel or custom device according to the spec, 
> > > this patch calls the built in kernel to query the GLOBAL_WOR_SIZ.
> > > 
> > 
> > This commit message doesn't seem to match the contents of the patch.
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Luo <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  tests/cl/api/get-kernel-work-group-info.c |   40 
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > >  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tests/cl/api/get-kernel-work-group-info.c 
> > > b/tests/cl/api/get-kernel-work-group-info.c
> > > index 47d09da..2b2c7ba 100644
> > > --- a/tests/cl/api/get-kernel-work-group-info.c
> > > +++ b/tests/cl/api/get-kernel-work-group-info.c
> > > @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ piglit_cl_test(const int argc,
> > >  
> > >   int i;
> > >   cl_int errNo;
> > > + cl_program built_in_prog;
> > >   cl_kernel kernel;
> > >  
> > >   size_t param_value_size;
> > > @@ -70,15 +71,47 @@ piglit_cl_test(const int argc,
> > >   const cl_kernel_work_group_info* kernel_work_group_infos =
> > >           PIGLIT_CL_ENUM_ARRAY(cl_kernel_work_group_info);
> > >  
> > > - kernel = clCreateKernel(env->program,
> > > -                         "dummy_kernel",
> > > -                         &errNo);
> > > + char* built_in_kernel_names;
> > > + char* kernel_name;
> > > + size_t built_in_kernels_size;
> > > + size_t ret_sz;
> > > +
> > > + errNo = clGetDeviceInfo(env->device_id, CL_DEVICE_BUILT_IN_KERNELS, 0, 
> > > 0, &built_in_kernels_size);
> > > + if(!piglit_cl_check_error(errNo, CL_SUCCESS)) {
> > > +         fprintf(stderr,
> > > +                 "Failed (error code: %s): Get Device Info.\n",
> > > +                 piglit_cl_get_error_name(errNo));
> > > +         return PIGLIT_FAIL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + built_in_kernel_names = (char* )malloc(built_in_kernels_size * 
> > > +sizeof(char) );
> > > +
> > > + errNo = clGetDeviceInfo(env->device_id, CL_DEVICE_BUILT_IN_KERNELS, 
> > > built_in_kernels_size, (void*)built_in_kernel_names, &ret_sz);
> > > + if(!piglit_cl_check_error(errNo, CL_SUCCESS)) {
> > > +         fprintf(stderr,
> > > +                 "Failed (error code: %s): Get Device Info.\n",
> > > +                 piglit_cl_get_error_name(errNo));
> > > +         return PIGLIT_FAIL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + built_in_prog = 
> > > +clCreateProgramWithBuiltInKernels(env->context->cl_ctx, 1, 
> > > +&env->device_id, built_in_kernel_names, &errNo);
> > 
> > Won't this call fail if there are no builtin kernels?
> > 
> > -Tom
> > 
> > > + if(!piglit_cl_check_error(errNo, CL_SUCCESS)) {
> > > +         fprintf(stderr,
> > > +                 "Failed (error code: %s): Create BuiltIn Program.\n",
> > > +                 piglit_cl_get_error_name(errNo));
> > > +         return PIGLIT_FAIL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + kernel_name = strtok(built_in_kernel_names, ";");
> > > +
> > > + kernel = clCreateKernel(built_in_prog, kernel_name,  &errNo);
> > >   if(!piglit_cl_check_error(errNo, CL_SUCCESS)) {
> > >           fprintf(stderr,
> > >                   "Failed (error code: %s): Create kernel.\n",
> > >                   piglit_cl_get_error_name(errNo));
> > >           return PIGLIT_FAIL;
> > >   }
> > > + free(built_in_kernel_names);
> > >  
> > >   /*** Normal usage ***/
> > >   for(i = 0; i < num_kernel_work_group_infos; i++) { @@ -188,6 +221,7 
> > > @@ piglit_cl_test(const int argc,
> > >   }
> > >  
> > >   clReleaseKernel(kernel);
> > > + clReleaseProgram(built_in_prog);
> > >  
> > >   return result;
> > >  }
> > > --
> > > 1.7.9.5
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Piglit mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
> _______________________________________________
> Beignet mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet
_______________________________________________
Beignet mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet

Reply via email to