From http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/Beignet/ :
Based on our test result, LLVM 3.5 has best pass rate on all the test suites. Compare to LLVM 3.5, LLVM 3.6 has slightly lower pass rate(caused by one front end bug at clang 3.6) but has better performance (3% to 5% up).
When I run the test suite, I get the same failures with LLVM 3.5 and 3.6: runtime_alloc_host_ptr_buffer() (due to my Linux being too old) and, in non-strict-conformance mode only, builtin_powr_float*() (negative inputs return abs(x)**y instead of the spec's NaN: not a bug since this is non-strict mode).
Has this bug been fixed (in which case we'd be better off using 3.6 and gaining the 3-5% speedup), or is this failure on something other than the built-in test suite?
_______________________________________________ Beignet mailing list Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet
