Hi there, First post here, so first of all thanks for building Beignet and this 1.3 release!
I’m ArchLinux packager for beignet[0], and I’m trying to figure out how/if I should package Beignet with OpenCL 2.0 support. From what I understand, compiling with -DENABLE_OPENCL_20=1 just results in two added files: /usr/lib/beignet/beignet_20.bc /usr/lib/beignet/beignet_20.pch But to get to this result, I had to bypass the check at compilation time since I’m not compiling on SKL+. However some users might very well be using SKL+. So, my question mostly is: outside of the issue stated in the README about use of `-cl-std=CL1.2`, is there any downside in compiling with OpenCL 2.0 support, in particular when considering the package will be used on pre-SKL machines? Especially, why is the build process depending on the hardware it is build on? This is not a good thing in general for packaging in distro. Thanks, Bruno [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/beignet
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Beignet mailing list Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet
