Moinak Ghosh <[email protected]> wrote: > > Due to various engagements, including another interesting project I > have been working on, I have not yet focused full energy into working > on this. However I am doing some work and one conclusion I have > come to is that I do not want to touch the existing SVR4 codebase. > This comes from past experience with the codebase @ SUN. In one > short word it is horrid. I do not wish to waste my time on that.
If you know real problems in the SVr4 pkg format or implementation, feel free to shre them with others. > Supporting SVR4 correctly will require some effort but I think it is > doable getting a cleaner implementation in the process and avoiding > re-inventing wheels. The result from my investigations is that it is easier to get the few missing parts into the SVR4 package that to make the reinvented wheel (IPS) work to my needs. Jörg -- EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [email protected] (uni) [email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ belenix-discuss mailing list http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/belenix-discuss http://groups.google.com/group/belenix-discuss
