Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
We can easily modify the list settings so that non-member posters will get an
email message stating that they should use users@ instead.
I agree with Taneem that the core@ list should be restricted. I'm not sure
what his reasons are (hopefully he will elaborate soon), but I think it's
important for us to clearly define which individuals we consider to be core
members. I'm not sure what Ankur's name is worth in the real world nowadays,
but clearly there has been some abuse of it. The only reasonable way of
disassociating Ankur with such abuse is to make clear which individuals have
the authority to act 'officially' as Ankur representatives. By default only
core members should have this authority.
I agree with Deepayan about this. Many people just becomes a member of
core@ and starts posting about their query. This place should be a place
only for the representatives.
Omi
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: GoToMeeting - the easiest way to collaborate
online with coworkers and clients while avoiding the high cost of travel and
communications. There is no equipment to buy and you can meet as often as
you want. Try it free.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7402&alloc_id=16135&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bengalinux-core mailing list
Bengalinux-core@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bengalinux-core
