Hi Dave:

David Mathog wrote:
There are 12 dual opteron server class motherboards just on Tyan's
site, not counting minor variants, plus some from SuperMicro, Sun,
and etc.  Half a dozen chipsets are used on these boards.  Too
much choice and very little time  - I have to buy something early
next week and just started looking today.  So please pipe up if you
have a dual opteron motherboard and/or server that you're happy
with and that has been reliable as a file server/head node.

We'll probably go with midrange Ultra320 SCSI internal disks again
(10K 74Gb drives from Maxtor or Seagate) since the high end SATA
drives cost nearly as much for the same capacity.  For this particular

Hmmm.... I would argue that 7200 RPM disks make more sense for a number of reasons.

cluster huge amounts of disk space are not required, and I suppose
if we ever need it we could stuff in a couple of 500Gb SATA drives.
(At which point the DLT320 would have to be replaced too.)

If you are looking for IO speed, nothing beats more spindles.


General specs for this server are:

dual opteron (around 246, speed isn't critical, dual core per socket
   not required)

Might look at 242's then

socket 940   (or is that a mistake these days?)

Not really.  Socket F stuff is on pricewatch and other places.

512M-1Gb ECC memory per socket (enough for a file server, no
   serious computing on this node.)

I would recommend upping the memory. Computing or not, large buffer caches on file servers are with very rare exception, a preferred config.

2Gb/socket minimum. Nothing serves files faster than having them already sitting in ram.

4 x 74 Gb disks Ultra320 (or make an argument for a particular SATA)

Let me be the first to argue that you are about to waste obscene amounts of money on this. If you really feel more comfortable with SCSI, get SAS. Otherwise go SATA (Seagate 7200.10 SATA 300/NCQ NL units). SAS is still somewhat of a waste if you are not using its advanced features, but if you get a nice LSI SAS controller card, it can also talk SATA.

dual 10/100/1000 ethernet on the mobo

Careful on this... we and our customers have been badly bitten by tg3 and broadcom NICs. If the MB doesn't have Intel NICs, get an Intel 1000/MT dual gigabit card. You won't regret that, and it is money well spent.

at least 1 serial port (2 ideally, since the UPS is controlled through
   one port.  I suppose we could add a USB->serial port converter,
   or a serial port card if this is a problem.)

I would get a multiport serial card for that, most MB have a single serial, so if you want to do serial console, you need another method for the UPS. If they ups talks USB you are in OK shape, otherwise get the ports on a PCI card.

Dual Ultra320 controller on board or on a card, one channel brought
   out to the rear of the case for backup.

If you are going to tie this to an existing SCSI backup, try an LSIU320 card or similar. Lower cost, and fine for running backups.

Graphics - whatever is on the motherboard, probably will only ever
be used to set up the BIOS and maybe for the OS install. Disk storage slots >4, hot swap isn't required.
CD/DVD - for OS install diagnostics only
floppy - probably not
case - 2U (big enough for adequate ventilation, right?)

Yeah, just make sure you have good airflow.


Thanks,
David Mathog
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, [email protected]
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

--
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable Informatics LLC,
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web  : http://www.scalableinformatics.com
phone: +1 734 786 8423
fax  : +1 734 786 8452
cell : +1 734 612 4615
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, [email protected]
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

Reply via email to