"Interesting" because I found it a very enlightened argument/POV in this
whole multi-core frenzy. I _certainly_ do not disagree, I do not know
yet if I totally agree (see my mail on BLACS and GotoBLAS in this same
thread).
My mail was actually not really intended for the whole beowulf-ml. I
just found it shocking revealing and I think many multi-thread advocates
would have a hard-time responding to such a clear statement.
t
Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 03:17:16PM +0200, Toon Knapen wrote:
Because of everybody going multi-core, everybody is pushing to go
multi-threading to exploit these architectures (e.g. the gaming-world
and many more). IIUC you're saying that MPI might better exploit these
architectures? Interesting POV!
Why "interesting"? Do you disagree that message-passing is the way to
go, since shared memory doesn't scale?
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, [email protected]
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
