Robert G. Brown wrote: > So yes, I think that LCDs are, on average, far better for the planet and > your pocketbook than CRTs (remember, an 80W power differential can add > up to $100's in power savings over the lifetime of a monitor), but not > perfect. LEDs, if/when they ever appear (Cree, are you listening?) > would almost certainly be better than either in all ways.
led backlit displays are already commercially available (for a year or more in some case like cellphone and high-end lcd tv), with the new mac be a notable but not first example in a laptop. As lumens/watt continues to increase their advantages over ccfl's will continue to grow... At the same time direct emissive displays (oled) will eventually challenge lcd in most areas where lcd currently challenges other technology. > rgb > >> >> Wikipedia is a good source of keywords for use in further research. I >> would not consider Wikipedia an authoritative source of information on >> it's own. > _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
