Jan Heichler wrote:
Hallo Rahul,


Montag, 6. April 2009, meintest Du:


RN> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Chris Samuel <csam...@vpac.org <mailto:csam...@vpac.org>> wrote:

> Even though we could reproduce it on 64-bit Debian

> and 32-bit CentOS they wouldn't escalate the issue

> until we could reproduce it on RHEL5 - which we did

> today.



RN> Thanks for sharing the anecdote Chris. I wonder if there is any clause

RN> in the contracts restricting us to run certain OS's.


RN> So long as we are using a "reputable" well-tested OS I find it unfair

RN> that the vendors engage in so much arm-twisting. Is there any

RN> scientific evidence that the core kernels of Debian or Fedora or CenOS

RN> (that *is* essentially RHEL isn't it?) are any less reliable then

RN> RHEL? What is / are the distros of choice on the Beowulf community?

RN> Just getting a feel.


RN> I have tried out cutting edge distros meant for scientific

RN> applications like ScientificLinux or ComputeNodeLinux but I've found


ScientificLinux is - in fact - RHEL. So it is not more "cutting edge" than CentOS...

RN> it more practical to stick to a larger, well used distro. No doubt I

RN> might take some performance cuts on the benchmarks but the simple

RN> reality of a larger user community out there makes it easier to debug

RN> stuff and get well-tested apps and code that will run on my Distro

RN> out-of-the box.


I See that ScientificLinux has a huge community using it - at least in Europe. Some big research institutes are using it (CERN for example) - some projects set it as the default distro (D-Grid - a german GRID project).

So i don't see you point here ;-)

And in the US, the Tier2 and Tier3 LHC participants are using ScientificLinux, too. In fact, we've a couple of researchers here who will use no other distro. you know, like RHEL or CentOS. Too dangerous in their eyes.


gc
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

Reply via email to