> Young pretenders to FORTRAN's throne. > > http://arstechnica.com/science/2014/05/scientific-computings-future-can-any-coding-language-top-a-1950s-behemoth/?kw=100k_pvs&search=100k_pvs >
Somewhat myopic view of the "possibilities." A pretty good description of the languages it covers (Fortran, Haskell, Clojure, and Julia) Really misses on C/C++ and some other things like OpenMP, MPI to name a few. I like Julia BTW, seems to be the right mix or pragmatism and performance. I also find this reoccurring notion that HPC needs to run out and replace Fortran with something else kind of silly. Fortran is doing just fine, thank you. And if you can make a case or have a requirement for some other language, then use what works for your requirements. When young programmers make snide remarks about Fortran and rewriting codes in modern languages, I ask them if they also considered replacing the old copper plumbing in their house (or parents house) because there are modern products like Pex. I don't even wait for an answer. I just tell them to get off my lawn. -- Doug > -- > Mailscanner: Clean > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] sponsored by Penguin Computing > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > -- Doug -- Mailscanner: Clean _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
