Rose wrote:
> I totally disagree with your comments. I would assume that the fussy puppy
> was fed Eukanuba Large Breed Puppy at the breeders without problems, after
> all she made it to leaving home time

Hi Rose

Please let me precede the following by stating that I greatly value both
your experience and expertise on the berner-list. Thanks to your input, I,
like many others berner-l members, have been able to considerably increase
my knowledge in many doggy related areas for which I am truly grateful.

Nevertheless, when it comes to a breeder prescribed diet, the dog refusing
to eat it, and the new owner being told that s/he should stick to the
breeders diet regardless rather than trying out something new, we have to
agree to disagree. Strongly if necessary.

Why should a puppy have to continue to eat something she actively dislikes
with the exception of live preserving medication? Why? Because the breeder
said so? With all due respect to all the breeders out there, but surely diet
recommendations should be just that - recommendations. To facilitate matters
for both puppy and new owner. To make it a STIPULATION what another person's
dog - and yes, if the puppy has been sold it IS another person's dog -
should and shouldn't eat is dictatorial and is taking matters too far. What
a breeder chooses to feed his own dogs isn't gospel nor should it be. I
think we can safely say that there is more than one decent brand of dog food
on the market and that many dog owners are a lot more educated about diet
than some breeders.

Should food not be enjoyed rather than endured? If the answer is yes than
why not try out another brand? If we applied the principle of "unless you
eat what I just gave you,  you will eat nothing, never mind how much you
hate it, and I will give you the same thing until you are so hungry that
you'll eat anything " to children, we would be accused of abusing our power
as their care takers. And rightly so. I think the same goes for our dogs.

Will it make the dog fussy if one tries out another diet? I sincerely doubt
it. Why would it? Yes, maybe one has to try a few different ones before
finding one that both dog and owner are happy with, but so what. Sure, if
you serve the puppy roast chicken one day and then expect it to eat boring
kibble the next it might turn up it's nose, but we weren't talking about
those extremes. I was talking about different brands of complete & balanced
foods.

We already make so many decisions for our dogs. When they are allowed to go
out. For how long. If they are allowed to go out at all. When they eat and
how much. How long they have to stay alone at home and how often. In a crate
or out of it. In light of this, is it really too much to ask that a dog can
a least have a LITTLE bit of choice in WHAT it eats? Oh, come on.

> If a puppy owner chooses to experiment with a variety of kibbles then they
> are likely to gain experience with diarrhoea and other gastric problems

Both my dogs eat a huge variety of foods. Always have done. They don't have
gastric problems. They never get diarrhoea except from turkey or eating too
much marrow from fresh bones. Therefore I scoop some of the marrow out and
omit turkey. The only dog owners I know whose dogs have persistent stomach
upsets have exclusively kibble fed dogs. The moment the dogs eat a morsel of
something different they end up with an upset stomach. I guess their system
can't handle it. Not exactly a recommendation not to deviate from the same
kibble day in day out, but there you are.

>Dogs will eat faeces, rotting
> carcasses and socks etc, ......
And yet they will still not touch Eukanuba! I rest my case.

:-)

All the best

Michaela, Harvey &  Rupert
Devon/UK




Reply via email to