RT overlap is a configuration issue not a protocol design issue. It is easy to avoid it by proper RT assignment for non congruent services.
Cheers, R. On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Haoweiguo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Bertrand, > What's your solution for RT overlap issue or other possible > issue?Sometimes it is unfortunate that designing beauty needs to be > compromised in reality. > Thanks > weiguo > > ________________________________________ > 发件人: Bertrand Duvivier (bduvivie) [[email protected]] > 发送时间: 2014年11月14日 16:00 > 收件人: Henderickx, Wim (Wim) > 抄送: Haoweiguo; Thomas Morin; BESS; IDR Chairs > 主题: Re: [bess] 答复: Flowspec for L2VPN and E-VPN > > +1... Would to avoid to see multiplication of fs safi. > > Sent from iPAD > > > > On Nov 14, 2014, at 01:15, Henderickx, Wim (Wim) < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > If we define a new things I prefer to address the wider issue and include > > L2 in that. > > > >> On 13/11/14 14:13, "Haoweiguo" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Wim, > >> Allocating different AFI/SAFI(s) for each flow spec application is a > >> applicable solution. Theoretically, unified mechanism for all flowspec > >> can be designed, but it maybe a more harder work in IDR. > >> Thanks > >> weiguo > >> > >> ________________________________________ > >> 发件人: BESS [[email protected]] 代表 Henderickx, Wim (Wim) > >> [[email protected]] > >> 发送时间: 2014年11月14日 7:55 > >> 收件人: Thomas Morin; BESS > >> 抄送: IDR Chairs > >> 主题: Re: [bess] Flowspec for L2VPN and E-VPN > >> > >> As I stated in the IDR meeting my observation is that we require to many > >> AFI/SAFI(s) for all flow spec functions. Flow spec in general is > providing > >> match criteria¹s with related actions. Given the proposal on Flowspec > for > >> L2 is new we should look at the bigger picture. > >> In My view we need a mechanism in BGP to advertise Flowspec match > >> criteria¹s with related actions and they should cover L2/L3-IPv4/IPv6. > >> > >>> On 13/11/14 13:44, "Thomas Morin" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi WG, > >>> > >>> A heads up... > >>> > >>> These two drafts relate to BESS and thus may be of interest to us: > >>> - draft-hao-idr-flowspec-l2vpn > >>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html?draft=draft-hao-idr-flowspec-l2vpn-01> (on > >>> idr agenda, being presented right now) > >>> - draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn > >>> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn-00> > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> > >>> -Thomas > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> BESS mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> BESS mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > > > > _______________________________________________ > > BESS mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
