Hi Adrian, On Tue Dec 09 13:04:51 2014, [email protected] wrote: > Hi, > > I don't seem to have seen a copy of IANA's review comments on this > draft. sorry > if that is my mail system screwing up. > > IANA's comments are entered in the tracker and read as follows. >
My mistake. I had a typo in the [email protected] email address: Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> The email address you entered couldn't be found. Please check the recipient's email address and try to resend the message. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk. However, it also said that [email protected] address does not exist: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> The email address you entered couldn't be found. Please check the recipient's email address and try to resend the message. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk. The following organization rejected your message: pechora3.icann.org, zinfandel.tools.ietf.org. Has that address been set-up? Thanks, ~pl > My response will be in a response to this email. > > Cheers, > Adrian > > > IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: > > > > IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-04. Authors should > review > > the comments and/or questions below. Please report any inaccuracies > and > > respond to any questions as soon as possible. > > > > IANA's reviewer has the following comments/questions: > > > > IANA has a question about the IANA Considerations section of this > document. > > > > Previously, an early assignment has been made to support this draft. > The > > original request for an assignment is below: > > > >> <begin request=""> > >> Contact Name: > >> Thomas Morin > >> > >> Contact Email: > >> [email protected] > >> > >> Type of Assignment: > >> Assignement of a BGP parameter in a FCFS registry. > >> > >> Registry: > >> BGP Tunnel Encapsulation Attribute Tunnel Types > >> > >> See: https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-parameters > >> > >> Description: > >> Needed for draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system, to allow the use of an > >> MPLS-over-UDP encapsulation as specified in draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp > . > >> > >> No value has been proposed yet, next available value 13 would be > fine. > >> > >> Additional Info: > >> draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system > >> </end> > > > > IANA Question --> The IANA Considerations section said "This > document has > > no IANA actions." and, as a result, the assignment made through the > request > > above would not be made permanent. Is this the author's intent? If > not, could > > the draft be revised to indicate that the assignment made based on > the request > > above be changed from an initial assignment to a permanent > assignment. > > > > Note: The actions requested in this document will not be completed > until the > > document has been approved for publication as an RFC. This message > is only > > to confirm what actions will be performed. > > > > Please note that IANA cannot reserve specific values. However, early > allocation > > is available for some types of registrations. For more information, > please see > > RFC 7120. > _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
