Hi Barry, Thanks for reading. In line... > Please expand "VRF" and "PE" on first use. Ack
> -- Section 2.1 -- > > A router MAY accept a route whose ORIGINATOR_ID or NEXT_HOP value > matches that of the receiving speaker if all of the following are > true: > > Just checking here: > > 1. The "MAY" means that even if all the following are true, the router > might still not accept the route -- it's optional. Is that what's > intended? Yup. > 2. This text says nothing about what happens if *not* all of the > following are true. A router might still accept the route (or not). Is > that what's intended? Or is a "MUST NOT accept" meant to be implied in > that case? > > A route MUST never be accepted back into its source VRF, even if it > carries one or more Route Targets (RTs) which match that VRF. > > I think "MUST never be accepted" is a bit awkward, because one > immediately thinks of "MUST" as a positive command. I suggest "A route > MUST NOT ever be accepted...." Could do that if the authors don't object. I think we all thought is a bit obvious. > -- Appendix A -- > The title says "Local Extranet Application (non-informative)". Do you > mean "non-normative" here? Ha! :-) Adrian _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
