Hi Alia, Yeah, the "this implies" follows from the previous sentence that contains a "SHOULD NOT" and so this sentence is a descriptive annotation to the previous sentence. The subsequence sentence is back into the world of normative text.
A > -----Original Message----- > From: iesg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alia Atlas > Sent: 03 February 2015 16:48 > To: The IESG > Cc: [email protected]; bess- > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Alia Atlas' Yes on draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community-09: (with > COMMENT) > > Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community-09: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > In Sec 2,2, it says: > "This implies that when propagating routes into a VRF, > the ACCEPT_OWN community should not be propagated. Likewise, if a > route carrying the ACCEPT_OWN community is received in an address > family which does not allow the source VRF to be looked up, the > ACCEPT_OWN community MUST be discarded." > > In the first sentence above, it seems like the "should not" should be > either "SHOULD NOT" > or "MUST NOT". Is there a reason that the text is descriptive instead of > normative? _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
