Hi Amanda,
I have two questions.
The latest version of draft-ietf-bess-orf-covering prefixes is 06. Your
reference is RFC-ietf-bess-orf-covering-prefixes-03. Does that make a
difference?
Also, I assume that this string will be replaced with an RFC number when one is
assigned. Is that right?
Otherwise, it looks OK.
Ron
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amanda Baber via RT [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 6:32 PM
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: [IANA #812089] Protocol Action: 'Covering Prefixes Outbound Route
> Filter for BGP-4' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-bess-orf-covering-prefixes-
> 06.txt)
>
> Dear Authors:
>
> ATTENTION: A RESPONSE TO THIS MESSAGE IS NEEDED
>
> We've completed the IANA Actions for the following RFC-to-be:
>
> draft-ietf-bess-orf-covering-prefixes-06
>
> ACTION 1:
>
> IANA has updated the reference for the following BGP Outbound Route
> Filtering (ORF) Type:
>
> 65 CP-ORF [RFC-ietf-bess-orf-covering-prefixes-03]
>
> Please see
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-parameters
>
>
> ACTION 2:
>
> IANA has updated the reference for the following Transitive Opaque
> Extended Community Sub-Type:
>
> 0x03 CP-ORF [RFC-ietf-bess-orf-covering-prefixes-03]
>
> Please see
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-extended-communities
>
>
> Please let us know whether the above IANA Actions look OK. As soon as we
> receive your confirmation, we'll notify the RFC Editor that this document's
> IANA Actions are complete. (If this document has a team of authors, one
> reply on behalf of everyone will suffice.)
>
> We'll update the reference when the RFC Editor notifies us that they've
> assigned a number.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Amanda Baber
> IANA Request Specialist
> ICANN
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
