Andy,

Yes you Are right, I forgot to change the revision number. 

/Loa

Sent from my iPad

> On 23 May 2015, at 14:06, Andrew G. Malis <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Loa,
> 
> One small nit with your review - renaming a draft because the WG name changed 
> resets the numbering to -00, so the next revision will be 
> draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-00. However, the replaced-by information in 
> the datatracker will make the progression clear.
> 
> Cheers,
> Andy
> 
>> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Loa Andersson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Authors, wg and chairs,
>> 
>> I've read this document and think it is useful, and that we are almost
>> ready to request publication.
>> 
>> A couple of nits
>> 
>> 0. The nits tool gives errors on 54 lines that are too long
>> 
>> 1. The file name is still draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-03, while
>>    updating after wglc is should be posted as draft-ietf-bess-virtual-
>>    subnet-03.
>> 
>> 2. The document has 7 authors, please make sure that all of them meets
>>    the criterium that the RFC Editor sent out some weeks ago.
>> 
>> "The intent of the author list in the document header and the Authors
>>  Addresses space in an RFC is to indicate who is responsible for the
>>  technical content of the document."
>> 
>> 3. Does "across" in the abstract mean "within" or "between"?
>> 
>> 4. The concept "L3VPN-based" is used at a number of places ...
>> 
>> 5. The nits tool give warnings of "26 instances of lines with
>>    non-RFC5735-compliant IPv4 addresses".
>> 
>> 6. First paragraph on page 12 says "both ingress and egress PE routers
>>    MUST NOT decrement the TTL",
>>    The meaning is unclear, can one of them do it or neither?
>> 
>> 7. Do we need to consider IPv6?
>> 
>> Other than this I think this very useful document is ready to be
>> progressed.
>> 
>> /Loa
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> 
>> 
>> Loa Andersson                        email: [email protected]
>> Senior MPLS Expert                          [email protected]
>> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> BESS mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
> 
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to