Hi Nitin, Yes, I belive we should leverage it and thus not defining a new one considering that most of the flags are in common.
Cheers, Ali On 6/22/15, 10:36 PM, "Nitin Singh" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Ali , > >Is there plan to use layer 2 info extended community for EVPN too ? > >I think it is a good idea to leverage the " layer 2 info extended >community" to signal for Flow Label for EVPN VPWS service . > >Thanks >Nitin > >-----Original Message----- >From: BESS [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ali Sajassi >(sajassi) >Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 7:58 PM >To: Martin Vigoureux; [email protected] >Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-keyupate-l2vpn-fat-pw-bgp > > >Hi Martin, > >I think the draft is ready for WG adoption; however, I¹d like to suggest >two changes before the publication of the next rev: > >1) change the name from fat-pw-bgp to flow-label-bgp as this draft is >also applicable to EVPN/EVPN-VPWS and there is no PW in EVPN !! > >2) modify this draft slightly to include EVPN as well - i.e., the same >flag and procedures can be used in evpn when advertising EVPN routes. > >Cheers, >Ali > _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
