Sami,
Besides what Ali says, for your second question note that in the use-case 5.4
we are explicitly avoiding GW-IP non-zero plus router’s mac in the same update:
"The Router's MAC Extended Community MUST be sent if the associated
RT-5's GW IP Address is zero.”
Thanks.
Jorge
On 10/8/15, 12:31 AM, "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Sami,
>
>There are intended for different scenarios. When a subnet is sitting
>behind a TS, there is no need to advertise label/VNI in RT5 for that
>subnet because it gets resolved via label/VNI associated with RT2 for that
>TS. In other scenarios, where subnet gets directly advertised by PE (e.g.,
>no indirection and no RT2), then label/VNI for that subnet gets advertised
>in RT5.
>
>Cheers,
>Ali
>
>On 10/7/15, 2:56 PM, "BESS on behalf of Sami Boutros (sboutros)"
><[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Hi Jorge,
>>
>>In some of the use case sections in the draft, there is no mention of the
>>label/VNI that will be associated with RT-5.
>>As well if the router-mac will be associated with RT-5 and the GW-IP will
>>be set, why do we need to advertise those again in RT-2?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Sami
>>_______________________________________________
>>BESS mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
