On 10/15/15, 8:28 AM, "Stephen Farrell" <[email protected]> wrote:
Stephen (and everyone else): >IMO enough folks have commented on this aspect >that the wg would be wise to seriously consider the >readibility of their output...(This is not a discuss since >I've been assured that this is not a problem for implementers, >and while I do accept that, I also continue to worry about >it.) You're right, enough people have commented on the readability of the bess work. As I said in other threads, I don't believe that to be an issue with the implementation and development of the work in the WG. However, it is becoming an issue for appropriate reviews outside the WG. I'll work with the Chairs (and authors) on the clarity of upcoming documents. Thanks! Alvaro. _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
