My understanding is that an IP-VPN PE would not be able take advantage of “mass-withdraw”?
From: Henderickx, Wim (Wim) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 2:42 PM To: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-l3vpn- multihoming-00.txt Is the draft assuming also IP-VPN in the core or only EVPN? I don’t see a reason for excluding one or another From: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday 5 November 2015 at 14:40 To: Wim Henderickx <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: RE: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-l3vpn- multihoming-00.txt I did not get that either until Ali confirmed that in the meeting. I had thought that SPEs were running regular L3VPN (not EVPN) but the ones that a CE multi-home to would also use EVPN procedures. Now it looks like there is no “regular” L3VPN – everything is EVPN. Jeffrey From: BESS [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Henderickx, Wim (Wim) Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 2:25 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [bess] draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-l3vpn- multihoming-00.txt Maybe good to clarify in this draft which nodes are involved in EVPN from the drawing on p3 in https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-bess-11.pdf? Did I understood correctly in the meeting that this is required between all SPE(s), if so why?
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
