Hi, I think the WG had better form a team to explore the problem and possilbe solutions ASAP. Those voiced different opinions should join the team to work together. Thanks, weiguo ________________________________________ From: BESS [[email protected]] on behalf of Thomas Morin [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 19:01 To: BESS Cc: [email protected]; BESS Chairs Subject: [bess] Closing the call for adoption on draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc
Hi working group, Based on this long discussion following the call for adoption, we consider that there is no consensus at this point to adopt draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc as a working group document. Our understanding is that the problem to address and the different alternatives solution are worth exploring, and we consider that the question of documenting a solution can be raised again in the future. We identify that the following will be helpful in this perspective: - documenting the different alternatives and their pros and cons ; we encourage people having raised their voice in this discussion to work together to this - having consolidated information about what encapsulation the typical ToR hardware chipsets will support in the mid/long term ; it will be an important input to help the WG decide what solution should be documented Thank you, Martin & Thomas _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
