I support this draft. It improves the stability with the better DF election algorithm.
Thanks, Kishore > >On 1/11/16, 1:07 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" ><[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> >wrote: > >>Hello working group, >> >>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >>draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-df-election-02 [1] as a working group item. >> >>Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in the both >>cases, please also state the reasons). >> >>This poll runs until *the 25th of January*. >> >>Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this document. >> >>*Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that >>applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in >>compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 >>and 5378 for more details). >> >>==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please >>respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any >>relevant IPR. >> >>The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from >>each author and contributor. >> >>If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please >>explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet >>been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >> >>Thank you, >> >>Martin & Thomas >>bess chairs >> >>[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-df-election/ >> >>_______________________________________________ >>BESS mailing list >>[email protected] >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > >_______________________________________________ >BESS mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
