On 1/13/16, 1:11 PM, "mpls on behalf of Eric C Rosen" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
Hi! >While I put "idr" in the name of the draft, it's not completely >obvious which WG should own this draft (assuming it progresses) Deborah and I had a quick chat about this point and we think that (if it progresses) this document should belong in mpls -- if for no other reason just because RFC3107 was produced there. mpls-chairs: If this document progresses, please make sure that both idr and bess are cc'd on adoption and WGCL. Thanks! Alvaro. _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
