On 5/2/2016 4:05 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote:
Hi,
I guess it’s not possible to registered that bit already in this doc?
Mirja
The registration policy is "Standards Action". Before registering that
bit, someone would have to write the draft specifying its use, the WG
would have to adopt it, etc. I hope this will be done, but it is
outside the scope of draft-ietf-bess-pta-flags.
I think there are four other bits that are also known to be in use,
these are described in draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir. Presumably the
authors of that draft will ask the WG chairs to request "early
allocation" as soon as the registry is established.
Am 26.04.2016 um 21:29 schrieb Eric C Rosen <[email protected]>:
On 4/26/2016 12:22 PM, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:
Not important but why is the Extension flag bit 1 and not bit 0?
There is reason to believe that bit 0 is already in use in one or more
deployments. Hopefully, it will get properly registered once the registry is
created!
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
