Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-multicast-damping-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-multicast-damping/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - A nit in section 3: just because simulations show X does not mean that X will happen in the real world - is there any other evidence that "using this technique will efficiently protect..."? I don't mind if there isn't but perhaps s/will/is hoped to/ or similar might be a good idea if not. - The secdir review [1] called out a few more nits. [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg06533.html _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
