Hi Thomas, I support this document being adopted.
However I would like to see the comments that Carl Moberg and I brought to the authors in Prague get addressed (they still seem to be outstanding). Sorry - I should have followed up on those before now. There’s also some degree of overlap with draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang, and with draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01, and I’d like to see common components (e.g. BGP RTs/RDs) being abstracted into common models. Giles > On 4 May 2016, at 15:17, Thomas Morin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as a working group document. > > Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, > please also state the reasons). > > This poll runs until *May 25th*. > > This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on > draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period. > > > We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other > IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed > in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 > and 5378 for more details). > > ==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant IPR. > > The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from > each author and contributor. > > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly > respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in > conformance with IETF rules. > > Thank you, > > Martin & Thomas > bess chairs > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
