As coauthor, I fully support this document for WG adoption. It is very much 
needed to keep expanding the use-cases of EVPN in Operators.
I’m not aware of any relevant IPR.

Thanks.
Jorge


On 8/16/16, 5:37 AM, "Martin Vigoureux" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Hello working group,
    
    This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
    draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group 
    Document.
    
    Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, 
    please also state the reasons).
    
    This poll runs until *the 30th of August*.
    
    We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies
    to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance
    with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more
    details).
    If you are listed as an Author or Contributor of this Document please
    respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
    relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers
    from all the Authors and Contributors.
    No IPR has been disclosed against this Document
    
    If you are not listed as an Author or Contributor, then please 
    explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet 
    been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
    
    Thank you
    
    Martin & Thomas
    bess chairs
    
    [1] 
    
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates/
    


_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to