fyi

-------- Message transféré --------
Sujet : [IANA #949204] Early allocation request (draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates)
Date de renvoi : Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:43:04 -0800
De (renvoi) : [email protected]
Pour (renvoi) : [email protected], [email protected]
Date : Sat, 18 Feb 2017 00:43:01 +0000
De : Sabrina Tanamal via RT <[email protected]>
Répondre à : [email protected]
Copie à : [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Hello,
My apologies for forgetting to include the dates below.
5 IP Prefix route (TEMPORARY - registered 2017-02-17, expires 2018-02-17) [draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement] 9 Per-Region I-PMSI A-D route (TEMPORARY - registered 2017-02-17, expires 2018-02-17) [draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates] 10 S-PMSI A-D route (TEMPORARY - registered 2017-02-17, expires 2018-02-17) [draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates] 11 Leaf A-D route (TEMPORARY - registered 2017-02-17, expires 2018-02-17) [draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates]

Please see
https://www.iana.org/assignments/evpn

Best regards,
Sabrina Tanamal
IANA Services Specialist
PTI


On Fri Feb 17 20:37:11 2017, sabrina.tanamal wrote:
Hello,

We've made the following early allocations in the EVPN Route Types
registry:

5       IP Prefix route [draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement]
9       Per-Region I-PMSI A-D route     [draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-
procedure-updates]
10      S-PMSI A-D route        [draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-
updates]
11      Leaf A-D route  [draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates]

Please see
https://www.iana.org/assignments/evpn

Best regards,

Sabrina Tanamal
IANA Services Specialist
PTI


On Tue Feb 14 17:16:55 2017, [email protected] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in the framework of RFC 7120, we, as BESS chairs, are kindly
> requesting
> an early allocation of the code points below.
>
> The code points are defined in two documents:
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement [1]
> and
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates [2]
>
> There are known implementations using the code points for their
> defined
> use. WG has been polled for knowledge of conflict and none was
> reported.
> AD approves the request.
>
> Within the "EVPN Route Types" registry, defined by RFC7432,
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/evpn/evpn.xhtml
> could you please allocate the following:
>
> 5 | IP Prefix route | [draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement]
>  9 | Per-Region I-PMSI A-D route |
> [draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates]
> 10 | S-PMSI A-D route | [draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates]
> 11 | Leaf A-D route | [draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates]
>
> Please note that the 6 to 8 gap is on purpose. A 3rd document
> currently
> polled for adoption by the BESS WG makes use of these code points;
> code
> points for which we will most likely request an early allocation if
> and
> when it gets adopted.
>
> Thank you
>
> Best regards,
> Martin & Thomas
> BESS Chairs
>
> [1]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-
> advertisement/
> [2]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-
> updates/
>




_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to