It can be achieved by having ipv6 explicit NULL in data path. We may not need 
different label to identify AFI.

Regards
Swadesh

On 6/21/17, 8:39 AM, "BESS on behalf of Eric C Rosen" <[email protected] on 
behalf of [email protected]> wrote:

    Stig, thanks for your comments.+
    
    On 6/19/2017 5:47 PM, Stig Venaas wrote:
    > Hi
    >
    > I think this draft is mostly ready. I just have a couple of comments.
    >
    > In section 1:
    >     This revision of the document does not specify the procedures
    >     necessary to support MVPN customers that are using BIDIR-PIM.  Those
    >     procedures will be added in a future revision.
    >
    > Remove this text?
    
    We'll probably just change this to something like "Procedures to support 
    MVPN customers that are using BIDIR-PIM are outside the scope of this 
    document".
    
    > Section 2.1.  MPLS Label
    >
    > Should one use different labels to distinguish address families in the 
same VRF?
    
    Nice catch.  The customer's address family is identified by the AFI of 
    the MCAST-VPN routes.  There should be a requirement that a given router 
    MUST NOT originate two x-PMSI A-D routes with different AFIs but with 
    the same upstream-assigned label in their respective PTAs.
    
    > The PTA must be present in Leaf A-D routes so one can know the BIER
    > prefix of the router joining. It might be obvious, but I think it is
    > worth pointing it out. It is specified for IR (in RFC 7988 section
    > 4.1.1 it says: "Leaf A-D route MUST also contain a PTA"...
    
    For IR, the PTA is needed because each egress PE needs to advertise a 
    downstream-assigned label.
    
    For BIER, I was thinking that the BFR-Prefix of the egress PE should 
    appear in the "originating router's IP address" field of the Leaf A-D 
    NLRI.  However, it is probably better to allow the "originating router's 
    IP address" to be different than the BFR-Prefix, and in that case to use 
    the Leaf A-D route's PTA to specify the BFR-Prefix.
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    BESS mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
    

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to