Ah, thanks. That’s much more clear to me! > Am 19.02.2018 um 20:47 schrieb Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) > <jorge.raba...@nokia.com>: > > Hi Mirja, > > It should be "must be enable". However you are right that the sentence may be > worded a bit better. > We can change it as follows: > > It is worth noting that unknown unicast flooding must not be > suppressed, unless (at least) one of the following two statements are > given: a) control or management plane learning is performed > throughout the entire EVI for all the MACs or b) all the EVI-attached > devices signal their presence when they come up (GARPs or similar). > > Thanks. > Jorge > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mirja Kühlewind <i...@kuehlewind.net> > Date: Monday, February 19, 2018 at 2:45 PM > To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org> > Cc: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-us...@ietf.org" > <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-us...@ietf.org>, "aretana.i...@gmail.com" > <aretana.i...@gmail.com>, "bess-cha...@ietf.org" <bess-cha...@ietf.org>, > "Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <martin.vigour...@nokia.com>, > "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org> > Subject: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-08: > (with COMMENT) > Resent-From: <alias-boun...@ietf.org> > Resent-To: <jorge.raba...@nokia.com>, <senad.palislamo...@nokia.com>, > <wim.henderi...@nokia.com>, <saja...@cisco.com>, <utt...@att.com> > Resent-Date: Monday, February 19, 2018 at 2:45 PM > > Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-08: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Possible nit: > sec 9.1.3: "It is worth noting that unless: a) control or management plane > learning is performed through the entire EVI or b) all the EVI- > attached devices signal their presence when they come up (GARPs or > similar), unknown unicast flooding must be enabled." > Is this "must be enabled" or "must not be enabled"? > > > >
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
