Stephane,

Thank you for triggering the WG adoption call, it was indeed requested.
We’ll discuss among the authors, address some comments suggested by Eric and 
will let you know when we can resume the WG adoption call.

Apologies for the inconvenience.

Jorge


From: BESS <[email protected]> on behalf of "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 9:21 AM
To: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-skr-bess-evpn-pim-proxy

Hi Ali,

The WG adoption of this draft was requested during the IETF 100 (this is even 
displayed on the slides !). That’s really strange that as a co-author, you are 
not aware of this while you were in the room during the presentation.
Based on this official request, it was added to our processing queue.

If you changed your mind, that’s fine, but please advise us so we can update 
our processing queue.

As a consequence, please let us know if you are ready or not with this draft.

Brgds,


From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 19:55
To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-skr-bess-evpn-pim-proxy


Hi Stephane, Matthew:

Is there a process for WG call (or WG LC) call that you are following? I 
thought it is based on maturity of the draft, adoptions of the draft, history 
of the draft (how long it has been around), and a public request for it.

I am a co-author of the above draft and naturally I support WG call for it; 
however, I don’t see any request for it. Furthermore, it is relatively a new 
draft. Whereas, the draft that I requested for a WG call last week is very 
mature and has already been implemented by a number of vendors. So, I’d like to 
better understand the criteria that you use for deciding WG call.

Regards,
Ali

From: BESS <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, February 19, 2018 at 2:39 AM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-skr-bess-evpn-pim-proxy


Hello working group,



This email starts a two-week call for adoption on

draft-skr-bess-evpn-pim-proxy-01 [1] as a BESS Working Group Document.



Please state on the list if you support the adoption or not (in both cases, 
please also state the reasons).



This poll runs until *the 5th of March*.



We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond 
to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the 
Authors and Contributors.



Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document.



If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.



Thank you



(Martin), Matthew, Stéphane

bess chairs



[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-skr-bess-evpn-pim-proxy/




_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to