Folks,

Alexander is correct. This was a case of fat-fingers.

                                        Ron


> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 3:46 PM
> To: alexander.vainsht...@ecitele.com; hj2...@att.com;
> luay.ja...@verizon.com; Ron Bonica <rbon...@juniper.net>;
> keyup...@cisco.com; lucy.y...@huawei.com
> Cc: aretana.i...@gmail.com; i...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-
> editor.org
> Subject: [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7543 (5258)
> 
> The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC7543,
> "Covering Prefixes Outbound Route Filter for BGP-4".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.rfc-
> 2Deditor.org_errata_eid5258&d=DwIBaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeM
> K-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=Fch9FQ82sir-BoLx84hKuKwl-
> AWF2EfpHcAwrDThKP8&m=1rbrHpi8nOKLOcUVsROcxPWNv9KRKf8BDaXjkQ
> _VMh8&s=w2BpUoiUWk7bDOPH9WYqLPGrtKMCCrmCC67fjCR8uZs&e=
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Status: Held for Document Update
> Type: Editorial
> 
> Reported by: Alexander ("Sasha") Vainshtein
> <alexander.vainsht...@ecitele.com>
> Date Reported: 2018-02-08
> Held by: Alvaro Retana (IESG)
> 
> Section: Section 5
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> The UMR is characterized as follows:
> 
>    o  EVPN Route Type is equal to MAC/IP Advertisement Route
> 
>    o  MAC address length is equal to 0
> 
>    o  IP address length is equal to 0
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> In Section 5:
> 
> The UMR is characterized as follows:
> 
>    o  EVPN Route Type is equal to MAC/IP Advertisement Route
> 
>    o  MAC address length is equal to 48
> 
>    o  IP address length is equal to 0
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The original text provides conflicting definitions of the MAC Address Length
> in the Unknown MAC Route (UMR).
> 
> Since the UMR is a MAC/IP Advertisement Route defined in RFC 7432, and
> since this RFC states that the MAC Address Length in these routes is 48, the
> text in Section 5 should be corrected to match RFC 7432 as well as the text in
> Section 1 of this RFC (where MAC Address Length in the UMR is correctly
> defined as 48).
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7543 (draft-ietf-bess-orf-covering-prefixes-06)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Covering Prefixes Outbound Route Filter for BGP-4
> Publication Date    : May 2015
> Author(s)           : H. Jeng, L. Jalil, R. Bonica, K. Patel, L. Yong
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : BGP Enabled Services
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to