Hi Prasanna,

On Jun 29, 2018, at 6:30 AM, Prasannakumara S 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi All,

Related sections are:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7432#section-5
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7432#section-7.6

Would like to understand how ES-import RT should behave in case of

1. ESI type 1 - statically configured
    In this case on what basis one should import the ESI route as ES-import RT 
does not talk about ESI type 1. Why this should not follow the same semantics 
of creating ES-import RT as done for ESI Type 2; with the 6 high-order octates? 
If same ESI is configured in different VTEPS then it would still work.
This question comes because manually configuring the manual RT is tough to meet 
multiple combinations of multihomed sites.

 - Type 1 (T=0x01) - When IEEE 802.1AX LACP is used between the PEs
     and CEs, this ESI type indicates an auto-generated ESI value
     determined from LACP by concatenating the following parameters:

     + CE LACP System MAC address (6 octets).  The CE LACP System MAC
       address MUST be encoded in the high-order 6 octets of the ESI
       Value field.

     + CE LACP Port Key (2 octets).  The CE LACP port key MUST be
       encoded in the 2 octets next to the System MAC address.

     + The remaining octet will be set to 0x00.

     As far as the CE is concerned, it would treat the multiple PEs that
     it is connected to as the same switch.  This allows the CE to
     aggregate links that are attached to different PEs in the same
     bundle.

     This mechanism could be used only if it produces ESIs that satisfy
     the uniqueness requirement specified above.

I do not think, Type 1 is statically configured.


And if question was about


   - Type 0 (T=0x00) - This type indicates an arbitrary 9-octet ESI
     value, which is managed and configured by the operator.

Should it not be up to implementation to decide if they want to derive 
ES-import RT with 6 high-order octates  ?



2. ESI type 3 - MAC based ESI of the PE
    If MAC of the PE is considered then how different PE's can produce the same 
unique ESI? instead it should have used CE's MAC address?
Since last/hig-order 6 octets are used for import how RT-import works?

There is already Type 1 defined (Pasted above) which uses CE’s MAC address.

As mentioned in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7432#section-7.6 Auto derivation 
is only for Type 1, 2 , and 3. For other types, Admin would be responsible to 
configure correct ES-import RT.


Let me know if I am missing something.

Please refer me to any other drafts which are trying to address this; I can 
discuss over there and be part of that.

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Prasanna


.._______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to