Wim asked... > would you consider adding an MPLS label to the SFIR route in order to > support https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-malis-mpls-sfc-encapsulation-01.
I think that the idea of making such an addition is fine, but (and no offence meant to the authors of draft-malis-mpls-sfc-encapsulation) we might want to get a little more stability and (of course) clarify the relationship with draft-ietf-mpls-sfc. It would also be worth checking whether the mechanisms included in sections 3.2.1.5 and 3.2.1.6 already do the job, whether 7.6 helps explain, and whether the (already defined) Tunnel Encapsulation attribute can help. Shall we spend some face time in Montreal clarifying what needs to be added? Cheers, Adrian _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
