Hi Donald,
-----Original Message-----
From: Donald Eastlake <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 6:59 PM
To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Comments about draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd-01
Hi Jorge,
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 9:12 PM Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain
View) <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Donald,
>
> Thank you for this.
> For the second question, I get from your answer that you will keep both
encapsulations for the time being?
Well, once a draft is posted, it can't be changed, so the currently
posted -01 won't change but the -02 version that is being worked on
and is not yet posted eliminates the alternative encapsulation.
[JORGE] :-) of course. I misunderstood your answer. Sounds good then. Thank you!
Thanks,
Donald
===============================
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
1424 Pro Shop Court, Davenport, FL 33896 USA
[email protected]
> Thanks.
> Jorge
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Donald Eastlake <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, November 5, 2018 at 8:48 PM
> To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Comments about draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd-01
>
> Hi Jorge,
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 4:44 AM Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain
> View) <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Dear authors,
> >
> > I couldn’t make it to the BESS meeting, so my apologies if some of
these things have been discussed.
> >
> > Some comments/questions:
>
> Thanks for sending comments.
>
> > - In the last IETF, I suggested the use of BGP and the BGP-BFD
attribute to exchange discriminators, as in section 3.1.6 of
draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover. The idea seemed to be accepted, but it is
not in the new version. This would allow the signaling of the discriminators
along with MAC/IP routes, IMET routes, AD per-EVI routes, IP-Prefix routes,
etc. without the burden of having to support the EVPN LSP-ping draft.
>
> There is a draft version -02 in the works intended to include
> distribution of BFD discriminators in BGP but this revision was not
> completed to the agreement of the authors in time to posted before
> this meeting.
>
> > - The draft describes an encapsulation and an alternative
encapsulation. Is the intend to keep both? Wouldn't be better to leave only one
to ease implementations and interoperability?
>
> Currently, the candidate version -02 draft dispenses with with the
> alternative encapsulation.
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
> ===============================
> Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
> 1424 Pro Shop Court, Davenport, FL 33896 USA
> [email protected]
>
> > Thank you.
> > Jorge
>
>
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
